
-----------------------------------
aiolos
Tue 23 Jan, 2007

Google's anti-phishing plugin leaked passwords
-----------------------------------
Microsoft isn't the only one with security issues <b style="color:#FFA34F"></b>:<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b><b style="color:#FFA34F"></b>
<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b><b style="color:#FFA34F"></b>
<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b><b style="color:#FFA34F"></b>
A recent press release from web security provider Finjan Inc.<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b> has exposed a security flaw with Google's anti-phishing browser extension for the Firefox web browser.<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b> Apparently,<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b> the extension accidentally gathered some users'<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b> e-mail addresses and passwords.<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b> Finjan informed Google of the problem earlier this month before making their findings public,<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b> and Google has since released an updated version of their plugin that fixed the problem.<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b><b style="color:#FFA34F"></b>
<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b><b style="color:#FFA34F"></b>
How did an anti-phishing plugin wind up exposing user names and passwords to the general public?<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b> Google's software used a public blacklist,<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b> available from Google's servers,<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b> which listed sites that were fraudulently pretending to be banking or other financial institutions.<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b> Unfortunately,<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b> some of these sites embedded usernames and passwords directly into the URL&<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b>#8212;obviously phishing sites didn't have concerns about security&<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b>#8212;and were thus viewable by anyone.<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b><b style="color:#FFA34F"></b>
<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b><b style="color:#FFA34F"></b>
The fix was a simple one and merely involved Google stripping out any user information from the URL before posting it to the blacklist site.<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b> Still,<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b> the fact that a tool designed to help stop online fraud could have accidentally revealed sensitive user information is somewhat disquieting,<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b> especially given the fact that many people reuse the same passwords for multiple sites.<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b><b style="color:#FFA34F"></b>
<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b><b style="color:#FFA34F"></b>
Finjan recommends that home users disable features found on many web toolbars that enable URL sharing or forwarding,<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b> although this would impact many of the latest <b style="color:#FFA34F"></b>"social software"<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b> utilities that have been popular with Web 2.0 fans.<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b> Also,<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b> they strongly suggest&<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b>#8212;and this is always good practice&<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b>#8212;that users should never use the same password for more than one site.<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b> Corporate users are told to use <b style="color:#FFA34F"></b>"proactive"<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b> protection for their web security solution,<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b> as antivirus and URL filtering software by themselves may not be enough.<b style="color:#FFA34F"></b>
